Биржевая торговля
Дилинговые компании
Заплатить деньжата
Изобретение форекса
Интуитивная торговля
Ловушки. Глава 1
Ловушки. Глава 2
Ловушки. Глава 3
Ловушки. Глава 4
Мини Форекс
Начинающим трейдерам
Обман на Форекс
Околпачь форекс
Прочный форекс
Сообщества Трейдеров 1
Сообщества Трейдеров 2
Сообщества Трейдеров 3
Стоп-ордера. Глава 1
Стоп-ордера. Глава 2
Торговые системы
Удачный маклер Форекс
Успешная торговля
Форекс для чайников
Форекс знак
Эксперты форекс


Спонсоры публикации:



Архив статей :: One View: Background check effort merely harms rules-abiding people

Bill Young and Mike Haley's comments ("One Perspective: On Question one, rural sheriffs getting politics ahead of public safety, " Sept. 15) demand a rebuttal. The Background Check Effort has been touted because the cure for many methods from terrorism to domestic violence, and if My spouse and i believed for a instant that it would keep guns out of the hands and fingers of "the bande, cartels and other hard-core criminals that pushed (them) as sheriffs... " I would possibly be tempted to choose it. The fact is these folks don't care about that or any other laws. The only people who will be affected are the people who do care, and they also aren't the problem.

Typically the sheriffs point out in which 3, 000 weapons a year are sold inside Nevada to prohibited purchasers avoiding criminal background checks. For the sake of argument I'll accept that variety. How will passing this specific law change any kind of that background checks free? The dark-colored market will continue if this law is passed. These are crooks; criminals don't comply with laws. They go on to say that 5, 379 prohibited persons have been stopped from buying guns at registered dealers because of criminal record checks. I propose they were stopped from buying these particular guns, yet went on to purchase prints from the black industry. This is one of the difficulties with our gun laws and regulations; prohibited people devote a federal felony simply by even trying to purchase a gun finance.yahoo.com/news/free-background-check-online-people-132300118, but when a new dealer conducts any NICS check and finds out the customer is usually prohibited, there is no , the burkha. The paperwork includes name, address, phone number, and place of job, but no marshal ever shows up to consider that information.

Young and Haley give great statistics about 24 percent fewer officials and 46 pct fewer women killed in states along with expanded background checks, in conjunction with 48 percent much less suicides and a twenty four percent reduction in weapon trafficking. These gambling come from a New York Times article in addition to Michael Bloomberg's gun-control organization Everytown is responsible for them. However , Steve Lott in "The War on Guns" says, "Since 2013, says with 'universal' background records searches have experienced 124 per cent more mass general public shootings and substantially higher rates regarding death and damage. " Is this an incident of "figures may lie, but liars can figure"? I'll let the reader determine, but figures are available to support either side. What is absolutely fake is the claim, "The only people inconvenienced by Question 1 are dangerous criminals who won't be capable of getting their hands on guns. " A criminal court records search costs $150, using $25 for the NICS check and 50 dollars to the dealer to address the paperwork. Will that be an inconvenience to the young girl who has had some sort of death threat from the jilted lover along with wants to borrow the gun from the girl neighbor? How about often the serviceman who has already been called to productive duty and would like to leave his pistols with a co-worker, or the duck hunter who borrows a shotgun from a friend, as well as traveler who is going into Canada and foliage his handgun along with a friend in Washington (they already have that law there)? Would you like an inconvenience to all these folks when they give these kinds of guns back and must travel through the whole ordeal again?

The most awful thing about this rules is the way it criminalizes innocent conduct while being unenforceable. If the people within the above examples attempt to make their exchange and there is no rules officer present, which will know? Without entire gun registration : don't kid yourselves free criminal background checks, that is the end game here - there is not any way to prove as their gun is whose. The whole program depends on the honor system. Anybody see a problem with this?

Copyright (C) 2009 Time-To-Get-Money.Ru
Парни, сам я из Кореи и русский так себе знаю, так что не судите строго...